Accessibility testing service

Buyer

Web agencies delivering customer sites

Problem

Automated scans miss contextual accessibility problems.

Format

Evidence review and quality assurance workspace

Also fits

Operations; Customer Support

USP

Combines journey-based manual review with reproducible automated findings.

The product

Key screens: Journey inventory, issue evidence, fix verification. Open on a review queue ordered by reviewer-selected priorities. Show each finding beside the original evidence and applicable rule. Provide accept, dismiss and needs-information controls with reasons. A separate report view summarizes confirmed findings and unresolved items, not raw AI flags. In this product, the first view is journey inventory, followed by issue evidence and fix verification.

Core functionality

1. Run automated checks.
2. Inspect keyboard flows.
3. Review semantics.
4. Document user impact.
5. Prioritize fixes.
6. Retest remediations.

Customer workflow

Agree review criteria, ingest a sample, generate candidate findings, inspect supporting evidence, let reviewers confirm or dismiss each item, assign corrections, and recheck the affected material. Start with authorized sites, user journeys and agreed testing criteria and finish with accessibility findings and retest evidence.

AI and human review

Propose possible inconsistencies, omissions and rubric matches. Combine extraction with deterministic checks where rules are explicit. Reviewers make the final judgment. Keep false positives and missed cases visible during evaluation.

What the customer puts in

Authorized sites, user journeys and agreed testing criteria

What the customer gets

Accessibility findings and retest evidence

Accounts and administration

Versioned review criteria, evidence links, reviewer decisions, disagreement handling, correction assignments, recheck status and exportable review history.

MVP scope

Begin with web agencies delivering customer sites and one recurring use case. Build the first two modules: run automated checks; inspect keyboard flows. Provide operator assistance for the third module: review semantics. Deliver accessibility findings and retest evidence through a manual review queue. Perform other necessary full-scope functions manually during the pilot. Include all applicable access, accuracy and professional-review controls from the start.

After the MVP is validated

After paid pilots establish value, automate the remaining modules: document user impact; prioritize fixes; retest remediations. Add one validated source integration, reusable customer configuration and recurring delivery. Expand to additional teams, document formats or languages only after testing the new scope.

Build dependencies

Evidence coordinates, versioned rules, reviewer decisions and a representative reference set. Measure misses as well as confirmed findings before scaling.

Integrations and data access

Authorized repositories, technical documentation, application APIs and logs. Source repositories, task trackers and report exports. Keep findings as review proposals until authorized owners accept the resulting actions. These are candidate integration categories, not verified supported connectors.

Defensibility

A domain-specific review rubric and rights-cleared examples of confirmed defects, false alarms and reviewer reasoning. For this idea, build around combines journey-based manual review with reproducible automated findings. This advantage requires execution and accumulated customer trust; the base model alone is not a defensible asset.

Alternatives and positioning

Manual reviewers, checklists, generic scanning tools and specialist audit services. Differentiate on this specific proposed advantage: combines journey-based manual review with reproducible automated findings. Test it against the buyer's current method on the same task. Competitor coverage and uniqueness have not been established.

Revenue model and test pricing

Test USD 500-2,000 for a defined audit sample and report. Offer recurring review priced by reviewed items and specialist hours. Software-only access can follow a reliable reviewed service. All prices require validation.

Main delivery costs

Document or media processing, model evaluation, expert review, false-positive handling, rechecks and customer-specific rubric calibration.

Marketing message to test

Accessibility testing service for web agencies delivering customer sites. Combines journey-based manual review with reproducible automated findings. Demonstrate the claim through an annotated review of a checkout journey.

Acquisition channels

Web agency partnerships

Lead magnet

An annotated review of a checkout journey

The first 30 days of marketing

1. Week 1: interview five prospective buyers in this segment: web agencies delivering customer sites. Ask to see a recent example of the problem and their current process.
2. Week 2: prepare this demonstration using authorized or synthetic material: an annotated review of a checkout journey.
3. Week 3: present it through web agency partnerships and seek one narrowly scoped paid pilot.
4. Week 4: review verified issues resolved, false alarms, total delivery effort and a concrete renewal decision before increasing scope.

Paid pilot and validation

Have a qualified reviewer independently assess the same sample. Compare confirmed findings, false alarms and omissions. Repeat on unseen material before agreeing recurring volume. For this idea, use authorized sites, user journeys and agreed testing criteria and evaluate accessibility findings and retest evidence. Agree success thresholds with the buyer before starting; collect a baseline for verified issues resolved, false alarms. A positive signal is payment and repeat use with acceptable quality and delivery cost, not a favorable demo reaction alone.

Success metrics

Verified issues resolved, false alarms

Retention and expansion

Offer recurring reviews and rechecks of previously confirmed issues. Expand document or case types after validating the new rubric with qualified reviewers.

Operating controls and limitations

Protect secrets, customer data and source code. Use controlled environments, technical review and a recoverable deployment process. Validate source access and reviewer availability during the pilot. Maintain customer-level access, data deletion controls and a record of final approvals.

Investment indication

What it would take to build, from a first MVP to the full product. A planning range to start the conversation, not a quote. Running costs (model usage, hosting, reviewer hours) come on top.

Brand style (concept)