AI website design and publishing workspace

For

Small marketing teams and solo founders who need simple websites or landing pages without a developer

Solves

Building and publishing a simple site requires stitching together a design tool, a code editor, a hosting service and an analytics tool, and each handoff loses time and brand consistency.

Delivers

A reviewed, published site with forms, analytics and exportable code

Built in

about 5 weeks of creation time, MVP in 6 days

Investment

$14,500 for the MVP, $49,500 for the full product

Run it

Inside your business, or as part of your offer to clients

Reduce the number of tools and handoffs needed to go from a design request to a live, measured landing page.

1. Generate initial page mockups from a written brief.
2. Capture a reference URL and extract typography, colors, components and icons.
3. Crop and isolate specific page sections after capture.
4. Edit the design visually without coding.
5. Edit the generated code directly for fine-tuning.
6. Apply plain-English revision instructions to the mockup.
7. Run an agent loop that plans, writes code, inspects output and self-corrects.
8. Draft a build plan and wait for approval before executing changes.
9. Apply targeted find-and-replace patches to specific sections.
10. Show a live preview that updates as the agent works.
11. Maintain design tokens, config locks and design notes across iterations.
12. Publish to a live URL and connect a custom domain with SSL.
13. Collect form submissions in a dashboard.
14. Track page views, conversions, click and scroll heatmaps.
15. Add third-party tracking scripts.
16. Manage assets and export the project as code files.
17. Compare the reviewed result with the recorded baseline and value assumptions.
18. Capture corrections and named-owner approval before publishing.
19. Export a versioned reviewed, published site with forms, analytics and exportable code with source references and unresolved questions.

Everything these tools do, in one app

• AI-generated mockups Generates initial website or landing page designs based on user input.Found in Swiddle
• Visual editor Allows users to customize the design visually without coding.Found in Swiddle, HTML Pub
• Code editor Provides a code editor for fine-tuning the generated code.Found in Swiddle
• No-code publishing Publishes the website directly without requiring any coding.Found in Swiddle
• Code export Exports the project as code files for further development.Found in Swiddle, Agentic Website Builder 2.0 by Lokuma, MockPilot
• Fast turnaround Enables a live landing page in minutes.Found in Swiddle
• AI revisions AI assists with generating mockups and revisions based on user feedback.Found in Swiddle
• Agent loop An agent plans, writes code, inspects output, and self-corrects until satisfactory.Found in Agentic Website Builder 2.0 by Lokuma
• Plan-first workflow The agent drafts a build plan and waits for user approval before executing changes.Found in Agentic Website Builder 2.0 by Lokuma
• Targeted patching Edits apply find-and-replace patches to specific sections instead of rewriting whole files.Found in Agentic Website Builder 2.0 by Lokuma
• Live preview Shows a live preview that updates as the agent works.Found in Agentic Website Builder 2.0 by Lokuma
• Design system state Maintains design tokens, Tailwind config lock, and design notes to preserve brand rules across iterations.Found in Agentic Website Builder 2.0 by Lokuma
• Instant publishing Publishes AI-generated HTML to a live URL instantly via MCP/API.Found in HTML Pub
• Custom domains Supports connecting custom domains with SSL.Found in HTML Pub
• Built-in analytics Provides page views, conversions, click/scroll heatmaps, and attention metrics.Found in HTML Pub
• Forms and submissions Includes forms and a submissions dashboard for collecting user input.Found in HTML Pub
• Third-party scripts Allows adding third-party scripts for additional tracking.Found in HTML Pub
• Asset management Manages assets and provides export options.Found in HTML Pub
• Local capture browser Interacts with a live webpage, scrolls to load dynamic content, then captures a static version.Found in MockPilot
• Asset library extraction Automatically pulls typography, colors, components, and icons from the captured URL.Found in MockPilot
• Natural language editing Modifies the mockup using plain English instructions, with AI applying changes using extracted assets.Found in MockPilot
• Crop tool Adjusts height and isolates specific page components after capture.Found in MockPilot

What goes in, what comes out

The workflow

1. In
   Start with

   Written brief, brand assets and reference URLs

2. 1

   Confirm the buyer's problem and scope

3. 2

   Collect a written brief

4. 3

   Brand assets and reference URLs

5. 4

   Then follow this sequence: 1

6. Out
   Finish with

   A reviewed, published site with forms, analytics and exportable code

AI does the heavy lifting, people stay in charge

Use AI to interpret permitted inputs, suggest structured mappings and generate candidate outputs for the three stated task modules. Use deterministic code for arithmetic, schema validation, hard constraints and reproducible tests. Review source-linked explanations and uncertainty before accepting results. One fixed page template set and licensed asset library; final brand, legal and accessibility checks remain human. A model suggestion is never a verified fact, professional decision or authorization to act.

What your team sees

Primary screens: Brief and brand inputs, Editable build preview, Publish and measure. Use a thumbnail gallery for projects, a large central preview canvas, and a right-hand panel for the build plan, design tokens, comments and revision history. Let users compare plan, preview and code side by side. Display draft, changes requested and approved states. Provide a client preview link with comments anchored to the relevant section. Make the task-specific outcome a reviewed, published site with forms, analytics and exportable code visible beside its evidence, review state and value baseline.

Accounts and administration

Project ownership, asset versions, client comments, approval states, usage allowances, revision limits, download history and a rights record for supplied material. Add organization access boundaries, named reviewers, usage caps, data retention controls, export logs and explicit approval for external actions.

Integrations and data access

Customer-owned brand assets, authorized reference URLs and permitted analytics sources. Cloud asset storage, design-file import/export and hosting destinations. Start with file exchange and validate destination specifications before promising direct publishing. Start with authorized file exchange. Validate current provider access, usage rights and schema behavior before promising a connector.

We build with our own AI software development factory, so most implementations take days to a few weeks of creation time, not months. You see working software at every step, and exact timing depends on availability.

1. 1

   Scoping call

   Day 1

   Thirty minutes on your process, your data and how you want to run it: for your own team, or for your clients. You get a fixed scope and price for the MVP.

2. 2

   MVP

   6 days

   One buyer segment, one recurring use case; first modules: generate initial page mockups from a written brief; capture a reference URL and extract typography, colors, components and icons. Manual review in the loop. Built by our AI software factory.

3. 3

   Paid pilot

   7 days

   Accounts, roles, review states, audit trail and the first integration, hardened for two to three paying pilot customers.

4. 4

   Full product

   3 weeks

   Self-serve onboarding, billing, monitoring and the wider integration set.

5. 5

   Run and improve

   Monthly

   We host, monitor and improve it for a fixed monthly fee, or hand it over to your team. How the retainer works.

Why we start with an MVP

An MVP, or minimum viable product, is the smallest version that your users can actually work with. It is not a cheap version of the full solution. It is a test, built to answer the questions that decide whether the rest is worth building.

1. Pick the riskiest assumption. Here: will small marketing teams and solo founders who need simple websites or landing pages without a developer use it to solve "building and publishing a simple site requires stitching together a design tool, a code editor, a hosting service and an analytics tool, and each handoff loses time and brand consistency"?
2. Build only what tests it. One team, one use case, a few core modules. People do the rest by hand for now.
3. Run a paid pilot. Agree quality and outcome thresholds before the pilot using this measure: Time from brief to live page and accepted pages per revision round.
4. Measure, then decide. Track time from brief to live page and accepted pages per revision round; accepted-output rate; material error rate; reviewer correction time; actual repeat purchase. Then expand, change course or stop, with evidence instead of opinions.

MVP scope for this solution. Pilot scope: One fixed page template set and licensed asset library; final brand, legal and accessibility checks remain human. Implement one approved input format, a bounded representative case set and the first two task modules: generate initial page mockups from a written brief; capture a reference URL and extract typography, colors, components and icons. Support the third module with operator review: draft a build plan and wait for approval before executing changes. Include source references, corrections, basic organization access, approval states, export and value measurement. Use managed operator assistance for unresolved exceptions. The cost estimate covers this narrow prototype, not unrestricted multi-tenant scale, complex production integrations, specialist certification or physical operations.

After the MVP. Once paid pilots prove usefulness, automate repeatable reviewed steps and add one verified source integration. Expand supported inputs and case volume only after new evaluation cases pass. Build reusable customer configurations and recurring value reports around a reviewed, published site with forms, analytics and exportable code. Retain the explicit scope boundary: One fixed page template set and licensed asset library; final brand, legal and accessibility checks remain human.

What the build depends on. Asset upload and preview, asynchronous generation jobs, editable version history, reviewer access and tested export formats. High-fidelity production requires specialist creative QA. Obtain representative authorized cases, baseline measurements, qualified reviewers and a buyer-side decision owner. Specific limitation: One fixed page template set and licensed asset library; final brand, legal and accessibility checks remain human.

A planning range to start the conversation, not a quote. You pay per phase, so you can stop after the MVP.

Running costs per month

A rough indication of monthly hosting and AI model costs once it is live, not tested. Real costs depend on usage, file sizes and the models chosen.

Your brand, or this one

Run it under your own brand, or start from this concept style.

Selling it to your own clients: the go-to-market playbook

Pricing to test

Test a USD 300-1,500 fixed pilot for one defined site package. Offer a monthly production allowance after repeat demand. Quote complex multi-page or integration work separately. These are test prices, not market benchmarks. Package the initial sale as one bounded reviewed, published site with forms, analytics and exportable code. Recurring fees must specify volume, review depth and integration support. For exchanges, test a disclosed coordination or successful-service fee rather than holding customer funds. Reprice only after measuring real delivery labor; platform-build cost is separate from a commercial pilot fee.

Message to test

Reduce the number of tools and handoffs needed to go from a design request to a live, measured landing page. Demonstrate a concrete reviewed, published site with forms, analytics and exportable code using the buyer's approved example and show the baseline, corrections and actual delivery effort.

Where to find buyers

Small marketing teams and solo founders professional communities; specialist consultants serving this buyer; permissioned partner introductions; practical demonstrations at relevant trade or practitioner events.

Lead magnet

A reviewed sample reviewed, published site with forms, analytics and exportable code from a small authorized input set, with a transparent calculation of time from brief to live page and accepted pages per revision round and no promised savings.

The first 30 days

1. Week 1: interview five small marketing teams and solo founders who need simple websites or landing pages without a developer and inspect a recent example of building and publishing a simple site requires stitching together a design tool, a code editor, a hosting service and an analytics tool, and each handoff loses time and brand consistency.
2. Week 2: prepare a consented or synthetic demonstration of the three task modules.
3. Week 3: seek one bounded paid pilot with agreed baseline and acceptance criteria.
4. Week 4: measure time from brief to live page and accepted pages per revision round, reviewer effort and repeat-purchase interest. This is a demand-validation plan, not a thirty-day full-product delivery promise.

Paid pilot

Agree quality and outcome thresholds before the pilot using this measure: Time from brief to live page and accepted pages per revision round. Continue only if the buyer accepts the actual output, the intended job outcome improves without unacceptable errors, and measured delivery cost fits willingness to pay. Revise or stop if access is unavailable, qualified review cannot be provided, or apparent savings disappear after corrections and support. Use held-out cases when comparing model quality; use a properly reviewed comparison design before making causal claims. Record missing cases and negative results alongside successful outputs.

Success metrics

Time from brief to live page and accepted pages per revision round; accepted-output rate; material error rate; reviewer correction time; actual repeat purchase.

Retention and expansion

Repeat the workflow when the buyer again needs a reviewed, published site with forms, analytics and exportable code. Retain permissioned settings and reviewed examples, report realized value honestly, and sell increased volume or adjacent approved workflows only after contribution margin and quality remain acceptable.

Why clients would pick it

A reusable library of approved templates, brand rules and review examples, together with reliable delivery for a narrow marketing niche. Build a permissioned library of representative task cases, reviewer corrections and verified operating constraints for small marketing teams and solo founders who need simple websites or landing pages without a developer. Repeatable delivery and useful integrations matter more than access to a base model.

Alternatives and positioning

Swiddle, Agentic Website Builder 2.0 by Lokuma, HTML Pub, MockPilot, freelancers and generic site builders. Compare this product with the buyer's present method on time from brief to live page and accepted pages per revision round. Offer a bounded paid workflow instead of claiming broad autonomous expertise. Market uniqueness and competitor coverage are not verified.

Main delivery costs

Generation attempts, image and asset processing, storage, reviewer hours, client revision rounds and licensed source assets. Additional initial validation requires representative authorized sample preparation, buyer interviews, buyer-side evaluation and bounded validation of a reviewed, published site with forms, analytics and exportable code. Track cost per accepted output, including correction work, unsuccessful cases and support.

Preserve brand voice, source attribution, asset accuracy and usage permissions. Buyers approve substantive changes and publication scope. One fixed page template set and licensed asset library; final brand, legal and accessibility checks remain human. Keep all consequential actions under authorized human control and do not fabricate missing inputs, permissions, professional judgments or market evidence.