Internal communication task completion lab
Reduce failed administrative actions caused by unclear instructions.
- For
- Employee communications teams
- Solves
- Messages are judged by opens rather than whether staff can act.
- Delivers
- Organization-reviewed communication experiment
- Built in
- about 4 weeks of creation time, MVP in 5 days
- Investment
- $16,500 for the MVP, $50,000 for the full product
- Run it
- Inside your business, or as part of your offer to clients
What it does
Reduce failed administrative actions caused by unclear instructions.
- Observe completion barriers.
- Prototype clearer task messages.
- Compare accepted completion outcomes.
- Compare the reviewed result with the recorded baseline and value assumptions.
- Capture corrections and named-owner approval before consequential use.
- Export a versioned organization-reviewed communication experiment with source references and unresolved questions.
What goes in, what comes out
- Approved action requests
- Voluntary usability evidence
AI drafts, people review. Research evidence workspace with reviewed deliverables.
- Organization-reviewed communication experiment
How it works
The workflow
- InStart with
Approved action requests and voluntary usability evidence
- 1
Confirm the buyer's problem and scope
- 2
Collect approved action requests and voluntary usability evidence
- 3
Then follow this sequence: 1
- OutFinish with
Organization-reviewed communication experiment
AI does the heavy lifting, people stay in charge
Use AI to interpret permitted inputs, suggest structured mappings and generate candidate outputs for the three stated task modules. Use deterministic code for arithmetic, schema validation, hard constraints and reproducible tests. Review source-linked explanations and uncertainty before accepting results. No employee performance surveillance or covert tracking. A model suggestion is never a verified fact, professional decision or authorization to act.
What your team sees
Primary screens: Research question and consent, Evidence comparison, Reviewed findings and experiment. Organize work by research question. Show a source library, an evidence matrix and a draft findings panel with linked quotations. Keep contradictory findings and unanswered questions visible. Allow reviewers to inspect the original context before accepting an interpretation. Make the task-specific outcome organization-reviewed communication experiment visible beside its evidence, review state and value baseline.
Accounts and administration
Source provenance, participant consent where applicable, research questions, coding definitions, reviewer disagreements, citations and versioned conclusions. Add organization access boundaries, named reviewers, usage caps, data retention controls, export logs and explicit approval for external actions.
Integrations and data access
Approved company facts, permitted media sources and publication workflows. Permitted research libraries, interview recording imports, citation exports and document editors. Preserve original source metadata throughout the workflow. Start with authorized file exchange. Validate current provider access, usage rights and schema behavior before promising a connector.
How we build it
We build with our own AI software development factory, so most implementations take days to a few weeks of creation time, not months. You see working software at every step, and exact timing depends on availability.
- 1
Scoping call
Day 1Thirty minutes on your process, your data and how you want to run it: for your own team, or for your clients. You get a fixed scope and price for the MVP.
- 2
MVP
5 daysOne buyer segment, one recurring use case; first modules: observe completion barriers; prototype clearer task messages. Manual review in the loop. Built by our AI software factory.
- 3
Paid pilot
6 daysAccounts, roles, review states, audit trail and the first integration, hardened for two to three paying pilot customers.
- 4
Full product
10 daysSelf-serve onboarding, billing, monitoring and the wider integration set.
- 5
Run and improve
MonthlyWe host, monitor and improve it for a fixed monthly fee, or hand it over to your team. How the retainer works.
Why we start with an MVP
An MVP, or minimum viable product, is the smallest version that your users can actually work with. It is not a cheap version of the full solution. It is a test, built to answer the questions that decide whether the rest is worth building.
- Pick the riskiest assumption. Here: will employee communications teams use it to solve "messages are judged by opens rather than whether staff can act"?
- Build only what tests it. One team, one use case, a few core modules. People do the rest by hand for now.
- Run a paid pilot. Agree quality and outcome thresholds before the pilot using this measure: Completed requested tasks and support time saved minus content cost.
- Measure, then decide. Track completed requested tasks and support time saved minus content cost; accepted-output rate; material error rate; reviewer correction time; actual repeat purchase. Then expand, change course or stop, with evidence instead of opinions.
MVP scope for this solution. Pilot scope: No employee performance surveillance or covert tracking. Implement one approved input format, a bounded representative case set and the first two task modules: observe completion barriers; prototype clearer task messages. Support the third module with operator review: compare accepted completion outcomes. Include source references, corrections, basic organization access, approval states, export and value measurement. Use managed operator assistance for unresolved exceptions. The cost estimate covers this narrow prototype, not unrestricted multi-tenant scale, complex production integrations, specialist certification or physical operations.
After the MVP. Once paid pilots prove usefulness, automate repeatable reviewed steps and add one verified source integration. Expand supported inputs and case volume only after new evaluation cases pass. Build reusable customer configurations and recurring value reports around organization-reviewed communication experiment. Retain the explicit scope boundary: No employee performance surveillance or covert tracking.
What the build depends on. A clear research protocol, source access, citation tracking and qualified interpretation. Interview work also needs relevant participants and consent management. Obtain representative authorized cases, baseline measurements, qualified reviewers and a buyer-side decision owner. Specific limitation: No employee performance surveillance or covert tracking.
Investment
A planning range to start the conversation, not a quote. You pay per phase, so you can stop after the MVP.
- Phase 1
MVP
One buyer segment, one recurring use case; first modules: observe completion barriers; prototype clearer task messages. Manual review in the loop.
- Phase 2
Paid pilot
Accounts, roles, review states, audit trail and the first integration, hardened for two to three paying pilot customers.
- Phase 3
Full product
Self-serve onboarding, billing, monitoring and the wider integration set.
Indicative total, MVP to full product$50,000about 4 weeks of creation time · start with the MVP from $16,500
Running costs per month
A rough indication of monthly hosting and AI model costs once it is live, not tested. Real costs depend on usage, file sizes and the models chosen.
| Stage | Hosting and infrastructure | AI usage | Total per month |
|---|---|---|---|
| MVP and paid pilotabout 3 customers | $30–$60 | $80–$160 | $110–$220 |
| Full productabout 50 customers | $110–$210 | $880–$1,750 | $990–$1,960 |
Run it or resell it
For your own team
Employee communications teams run it inside the business: approved action requests and voluntary usability evidence in, organization-reviewed communication experiment out, reviewed by your people.
As part of your offer
Agencies, consultancies and software companies can offer it to their own clients under their brand. We build and maintain it; you sell and deliver it.
Your brand, or this one
Run it under your own brand, or start from this concept style.
- primary
#5f2791 - accent
#89c954 - surface
#ebe4f1 - ink
#22201e
- Headings
- Sora
- Text
- Work Sans
- Voice
- Articulate, timely, composed
Selling it to your own clients: the go-to-market playbook
Pricing to test
Test USD 750-3,000 for one tightly bounded research question and evidence pack. Participant recruitment, specialist review and licensed data are separately scoped. Repeat tracking can become a retainer. Prices are hypotheses. Package the initial sale as one bounded organization-reviewed communication experiment. Recurring fees must specify volume, review depth and integration support. For exchanges, test a disclosed coordination or successful-service fee rather than holding customer funds. Reprice only after measuring real delivery labor; platform-build cost is separate from a commercial pilot fee.
Message to test
Reduce failed administrative actions caused by unclear instructions. Demonstrate a concrete organization-reviewed communication experiment using the buyer's approved example and show the baseline, corrections and actual delivery effort.
Where to find buyers
Employee communications teams professional communities; specialist consultants serving this buyer; permissioned partner introductions; practical demonstrations at relevant trade or practitioner events.
Lead magnet
A reviewed sample organization-reviewed communication experiment from a small authorized input set, with a transparent calculation of completed requested tasks and support time saved minus content cost and no promised savings.
The first 30 days
- Week 1: interview five employee communications teams and inspect a recent example of messages are judged by opens rather than whether staff can act.
- Week 2: prepare a consented or synthetic demonstration of the three task modules.
- Week 3: seek one bounded paid pilot with agreed baseline and acceptance criteria.
- Week 4: measure completed requested tasks and support time saved minus content cost, reviewer effort and repeat-purchase interest. This is a demand-validation plan, not a thirty-day full-product delivery promise.
Paid pilot
Agree quality and outcome thresholds before the pilot using this measure: Completed requested tasks and support time saved minus content cost. Continue only if the buyer accepts the actual output, the intended job outcome improves without unacceptable errors, and measured delivery cost fits willingness to pay. Revise or stop if access is unavailable, qualified review cannot be provided, or apparent savings disappear after corrections and support. Use held-out cases when comparing model quality; use a properly reviewed comparison design before making causal claims. Record missing cases and negative results alongside successful outputs.
Success metrics
Completed requested tasks and support time saved minus content cost; accepted-output rate; material error rate; reviewer correction time; actual repeat purchase.
Retention and expansion
Repeat the workflow when the buyer again needs organization-reviewed communication experiment. Retain permissioned settings and reviewed examples, report realized value honestly, and sell increased volume or adjacent approved workflows only after contribution margin and quality remain acceptable.
Why clients would pick it
Niche research protocols, credible researcher relationships and a rights-cleared evidence archive with consistent interpretation methods. Build a permissioned library of representative task cases, reviewer corrections and verified operating constraints for employee communications teams. Repeatable delivery and useful integrations matter more than access to a base model.
Alternatives and positioning
Research consultants, internal analysts, literature databases and general search or summarization tools. Compare this product with the buyer's present method on completed requested tasks and support time saved minus content cost. Offer a bounded paid workflow instead of claiming broad autonomous expertise. Market uniqueness and competitor coverage are not verified.
Main delivery costs
Researcher time, source access, participant recruitment, transcription, evidence coding, expert review and report revisions. Additional initial validation requires representative authorized sample preparation, buyer interviews, buyer-side evaluation and bounded validation of organization-reviewed communication experiment. Track cost per accepted output, including correction work, unsuccessful cases and support.
Safeguards
Verify public facts and quotations. Keep publication authority explicit and preserve the original context behind media and reputation findings. No employee performance surveillance or covert tracking. Keep all consequential actions under authorized human control and do not fabricate missing inputs, permissions, professional judgments or market evidence.