Screenshot of the Operations agent orchestration control room interactive demo
Screenshot of the interactive demo, on sample data

Operations agent orchestration control room

Reduce manual coordination while keeping humans in control of consequential actions.

Try the interactive demo Get this built for you

For
Operations leads and delivery managers running recurring back-office and client workflows
Solves
Repetitive operational work is spread across disconnected tools, so risks, approvals and follow-ups depend on manual chasing.
Delivers
Reviewed agent actions with a tamper-evident audit trail
Built in
about 5 weeks of creation time, MVP in 6 days
Investment
$13,500 for the MVP, $46,000 for the full product
Run it
Inside your business, or as part of your offer to clients
01

What it does

Reduce manual coordination while keeping humans in control of consequential actions.

  1. Build and manage AI agents without code.
  2. Let agents learn to operate authorized software tools.
  3. Automate complete business processes through customizable flows.
  4. Monitor operational data to flag risks before escalation.
  5. Identify opportunities from operational data.
  6. Pause actions until a human approves them.
  7. Record a tamper-evident audit trail of what happened and why.
  8. Learn business context, key personnel and past decisions over time.
  9. Define escalation paths and data validation rules.
  10. Pause and request human input when confidence is low.
  11. Embed agents on websites to qualify leads into a CRM.
  12. Provide real-time data access for dynamic task execution.
  13. Schedule tasks to run autonomously at set times.
  14. Analyze activity across tools to find repetitive tasks.
  15. Suggest workflows based on each user's context.
  16. Draft routine updates and convert notes into tasks and planning docs into tickets.
  17. Handle resourcing, chase missing timesheets and identify uninvoiced hours.
  18. Assist with documentation, data migrations and environment configuration.
  19. Set configurable autonomy levels per agent.

Everything these tools do, in one app

What goes in, what comes out

What the customer puts in
  • Authorized tool activity
  • Operational records
  • Approval rules

AI drafts, people review. Operational coordination portal.

What the customer gets
  • Reviewed agent actions with a tamper-evident audit trail
02

How it works

The workflow

  1. In
    Start with

    Authorized tool activity, operational records and approval rules

  2. 1

    Confirm the buyer's problem and scope

  3. 2

    Collect authorized tool activity

  4. 3

    Operational records and approval rules

  5. 4

    Then follow this sequence: 1

  6. Out
    Finish with

    Reviewed agent actions with a tamper-evident audit trail

AI does the heavy lifting, people stay in charge

Use AI to interpret permitted inputs, suggest structured mappings and generate candidate outputs for the stated task modules. Use deterministic code for arithmetic, schema validation, hard constraints and reproducible tests. Review source-linked explanations and uncertainty before accepting results. One authorized tool set and approval policy; final operational decisions and external actions remain human. A model suggestion is never a verified fact, professional decision or authorization to act.

What your team sees

Primary screens: Agent builder and autonomy settings, Live operations queue, Approval and audit log. Use a thumbnail gallery for agents and workflows, a large central queue of proposed and running tasks, and a right-hand panel for context, risk flags and comments. Let users compare agent proposals side by side. Display draft, awaiting approval, running, paused and completed states. Provide a client-facing lead capture view with comments anchored to the relevant record. Make the task-specific outcome reviewed agent actions with a tamper-evident audit trail visible beside its evidence, review state and value baseline.

Accounts and administration

Project ownership, agent versions, client comments, approval states, autonomy levels, usage allowances, revision limits, download history and a rights record for supplied material. Add organization access boundaries, named reviewers, usage caps, data retention controls, export logs and explicit approval for external actions.

Integrations and data access

Authorized operational tools, CRM systems and permitted data sources. Cloud storage, ticketing and messaging destinations. Start with file exchange and validate destination specifications before promising direct execution. Start with authorized file exchange. Validate current provider access, usage rights and schema behavior before promising a connector.

03

How we build it

We build with our own AI software development factory, so most implementations take days to a few weeks of creation time, not months. You see working software at every step, and exact timing depends on availability.

  1. 1

    Scoping call

    Day 1

    Thirty minutes on your process, your data and how you want to run it: for your own team, or for your clients. You get a fixed scope and price for the MVP.

  2. 2

    MVP

    6 days

    One buyer segment, one recurring use case; first modules: build and manage AI agents without code; let agents learn to operate authorized software tools. Manual review in the loop. Built by our AI software factory.

  3. 3

    Paid pilot

    7 days

    Accounts, roles, review states, audit trail and the first integration, hardened for two to three paying pilot customers.

  4. 4

    Full product

    3 weeks

    Self-serve onboarding, billing, monitoring and the wider integration set.

  5. 5

    Run and improve

    Monthly

    We host, monitor and improve it for a fixed monthly fee, or hand it over to your team. How the retainer works.

Why we start with an MVP

An MVP, or minimum viable product, is the smallest version that your users can actually work with. It is not a cheap version of the full solution. It is a test, built to answer the questions that decide whether the rest is worth building.

  1. Pick the riskiest assumption. Here: will operations leads and delivery managers running recurring back-office and client workflows use it to solve "repetitive operational work is spread across disconnected tools, so risks, approvals and follow-ups depend on manual chasing"?
  2. Build only what tests it. One team, one use case, a few core modules. People do the rest by hand for now.
  3. Run a paid pilot. Agree quality and outcome thresholds before the pilot using this measure: Approved agent actions per operations hour and manual follow-ups avoided.
  4. Measure, then decide. Track approved agent actions per operations hour and manual follow-ups avoided; accepted-output rate; material error rate; reviewer correction time; actual repeat purchase. Then expand, change course or stop, with evidence instead of opinions.

MVP scope for this solution. Pilot scope: One authorized tool set and approval policy; final operational decisions and external actions remain human. Implement one approved input format, a bounded representative case set and the first two task modules: build and manage AI agents without code; let agents learn to operate authorized software tools. Support the third module with operator review: automate complete business processes through customizable flows. Include source references, corrections, basic organization access, approval states, export and value measurement. Use managed operator assistance for unresolved exceptions. The cost estimate covers this narrow prototype, not unrestricted multi-tenant scale, complex production integrations, specialist certification or physical operations.

After the MVP. Once paid pilots prove usefulness, automate repeatable reviewed steps and add one verified source integration. Expand supported inputs and case volume only after new evaluation cases pass. Build reusable customer configurations and recurring value reports around reviewed agent actions with a tamper-evident audit trail. Retain the explicit scope boundary: One authorized tool set and approval policy; final operational decisions and external actions remain human.

What the build depends on. Agent builder, live operations queue, approval workflow, audit log and tested export formats. High-fidelity operations require specialist process QA. Obtain representative authorized cases, baseline measurements, qualified reviewers and a buyer-side decision owner. Specific limitation: One authorized tool set and approval policy; final operational decisions and external actions remain human.

04

Investment

A planning range to start the conversation, not a quote. You pay per phase, so you can stop after the MVP.

  1. Phase 1

    MVP

    One buyer segment, one recurring use case; first modules: build and manage AI agents without code; let agents learn to operate authorized software tools. Manual review in the loop.

    $13,500 · about 6 days of creation time

  2. Phase 2

    Paid pilot

    Accounts, roles, review states, audit trail and the first integration, hardened for two to three paying pilot customers.

    $13,500 · about 7 days of creation time

  3. Phase 3

    Full product

    Self-serve onboarding, billing, monitoring and the wider integration set.

    $19,000 · about 3 weeks of creation time

Indicative total, MVP to full product$46,000about 5 weeks of creation time · start with the MVP from $13,500

Running costs per month

A rough indication of monthly hosting and AI model costs once it is live, not tested. Real costs depend on usage, file sizes and the models chosen.

StageHosting and infrastructureAI usageTotal per month
MVP and paid pilotabout 3 customers$30–$60$40–$90$70–$150
Full productabout 50 customers$110–$210$280–$560$390–$770
05

Run it or resell it

Internally

For your own team

Operations leads and delivery managers running recurring back-office and client workflows run it inside the business: authorized tool activity, operational records and approval rules in, reviewed agent actions with a tamper-evident audit trail out, reviewed by your people.

For your clients

As part of your offer

Agencies, consultancies and software companies can offer it to their own clients under their brand. We build and maintain it; you sell and deliver it.

Your brand, or this one

Run it under your own brand, or start from this concept style.

  • primary#4f2791
  • accent#a2c954
  • surface#e9e4f1
  • ink#22201e
Headings
Fraunces
Text
Inter
Voice
Calm, reliable, step-by-step
Selling it to your own clients: the go-to-market playbook

Pricing to test

Test a USD 300-1,500 fixed pilot for one defined operations package. Offer a monthly production allowance after repeat demand. Quote complex multi-tool or specialist operations separately. These are test prices, not market benchmarks. Package the initial sale as one bounded reviewed agent actions with a tamper-evident audit trail. Recurring fees must specify volume, review depth and integration support. For exchanges, test a disclosed coordination or successful-service fee rather than holding customer funds. Reprice only after measuring real delivery labor; platform-build cost is separate from a commercial pilot fee.

Message to test

Reduce manual coordination while keeping humans in control of consequential actions. Demonstrate a concrete reviewed agent actions with a tamper-evident audit trail using the buyer's approved example and show the baseline, corrections and actual delivery effort.

Where to find buyers

Operations leads and delivery managers running recurring back-office and client workflows professional communities; specialist consultants serving this buyer; permissioned partner introductions; practical demonstrations at relevant trade or practitioner events.

Lead magnet

A reviewed sample reviewed agent actions with a tamper-evident audit trail from a small authorized input set, with a transparent calculation of approved agent actions per operations hour and manual follow-ups avoided and no promised savings.

The first 30 days

  1. Week 1: interview five operations leads and delivery managers running recurring back-office and client workflows and inspect a recent example of repetitive operational work spread across disconnected tools, so risks, approvals and follow-ups depend on manual chasing.
  2. Week 2: prepare a consented or synthetic demonstration of the three task modules.
  3. Week 3: seek one bounded paid pilot with agreed baseline and acceptance criteria.
  4. Week 4: measure approved agent actions per operations hour and manual follow-ups avoided, reviewer effort and repeat-purchase interest. This is a demand-validation plan, not a thirty-day full-product delivery promise.

Paid pilot

Agree quality and outcome thresholds before the pilot using this measure: Approved agent actions per operations hour and manual follow-ups avoided. Continue only if the buyer accepts the actual output, the intended job outcome improves without unacceptable errors, and measured delivery cost fits willingness to pay. Revise or stop if access is unavailable, qualified review cannot be provided, or apparent savings disappear after corrections and support. Use held-out cases when comparing model quality; use a properly reviewed comparison design before making causal claims. Record missing cases and negative results alongside successful outputs.

Success metrics

Approved agent actions per operations hour and manual follow-ups avoided; accepted-output rate; material error rate; reviewer correction time; actual repeat purchase.

Retention and expansion

Repeat the workflow when the buyer again needs reviewed agent actions with a tamper-evident audit trail. Retain permissioned settings and reviewed examples, report realized value honestly, and sell increased volume or adjacent approved workflows only after contribution margin and quality remain acceptable.

Why clients would pick it

A reusable library of approved agent configurations, operational constraints and review examples, together with reliable delivery for a narrow operations niche. Build a permissioned library of representative task cases, reviewer corrections and verified operating constraints for operations leads and delivery managers running recurring back-office and client workflows. Repeatable delivery and useful integrations matter more than access to a base model.

Alternatives and positioning

Onpilot, O-mega, Panorama and Nitro by Rocketlane, plus manual coordination and generic automation tools. Compare this product with the buyer's present method on approved agent actions per operations hour and manual follow-ups avoided. Offer a bounded paid workflow instead of claiming broad autonomous expertise. Market uniqueness and competitor coverage are not verified.

Main delivery costs

Agent runs, tool API calls, storage, reviewer hours, client revision rounds and licensed source assets. Additional initial validation requires representative authorized sample preparation, buyer interviews, buyer-side evaluation and bounded validation of reviewed agent actions with a tamper-evident audit trail. Track cost per accepted output, including correction work, unsuccessful cases and support.

06

Safeguards

Preserve operational accuracy, source attribution, approval accuracy and usage permissions. Operations leads approve substantive actions and external scope. One authorized tool set and approval policy; final operational decisions and external actions remain human. Keep all consequential actions under authorized human control and do not fabricate missing inputs, permissions, professional judgments or market evidence.

Get this solution built

Built for you by our AI software factory, MVP in about 6 days. Tell us about your business and how you want to run it: inside your company, or as part of what you offer your clients. We reply within one working day.

More in Operations

Bring one process you are sick of. In thirty minutes we will tell you whether it can run itself. Book a call.

© 2026 Nexibeo LimitedFounded 2017contact@nexibeo.com