
Fit-First Wardrobe Service
A fit engine that learns from every return and adjusts patterns per individual, not just per size, using real manufacturing feedback.
- For
- Style-conscious professionals who buy clothes 4-6 times a year and hate returns
- Solves
- Clothing subscriptions still send boxes where half the items don't fit.
- Delivers
- A box of 5 made-on-demand garments adjusted to the member's body, with fit confidence scores
- Built in
- about 3 weeks of creation time, MVP in 4 days
- Investment
- $7,500 for the MVP, $27,000 for the full product
- Run it
- Inside your business, or as part of your offer to clients
What it does
For style-conscious professionals who buy clothes 4-6 times a year and hate returns, turn three smartphone photos, style preferences and occasion needs into a box of made-on-demand garments adjusted to their body.
- Extract 40+ body measurements from three photos.
- Match measurements against brand size charts and fabric stretch data.
- Interview style and occasion needs via voice or text.
- Generate a coherent look with adjusted digital patterns.
- Send digital files to manufacturing partners.
- Update preferences from return reasons.
What goes in, what comes out
- Three smartphone photos
- Style preferences
- Occasion needs
- Return feedback
AI drafts, people review. Visual production platform with managed creative review.
- A box of 5 made-on-demand garments adjusted to the member's body
- With fit confidence scores
How it works
The workflow
- InStart with
Three smartphone photos, style preferences, occasion needs and return feedback
- 1
Upload photos
- 2
Complete style interview
- 3
Review fit predictions
- 4
Adjust preferences
- 5
Approve order
- 6
Send patterns to manufacturer
- 7
Receive box with 5 items
- OutFinish with
A box of 5 made-on-demand garments adjusted to the member's body, with fit confidence scores
AI does the heavy lifting, people stay in charge
Use computer vision models to extract body measurements and language models to interpret style preferences. Predict fit per garment using size charts, reviews and fabric data. A human stylist reviews the AI picks and a fit expert checks pattern adjustments before shipping.
What your team sees
Key screens: Body map capture, style interview, fit prediction dashboard, order review. Use a guided photo upload flow with live feedback, a chat-style preference capture, a grid of predicted fit scores per garment, and a final order summary with pattern adjustments. Let users see fit confidence per item and reason codes. Display draft, changes requested and approved states. Provide a client preview link with comments anchored to the relevant garment. In this product, the first view is body map capture, followed by style interview, fit prediction dashboard and order review.
Accounts and administration
Member profiles, body map versions, order history, return reasons, stylist approvals, manufacturer records, pattern versions and an audit trail of fit predictions.
Integrations and data access
Manufacturing partner APIs, size chart databases, fabric data sources, payment processing and customer relationship management systems.
How we build it
We build with our own AI software development factory, so most implementations take days to a few weeks of creation time, not months. You see working software at every step, and exact timing depends on availability.
- 1
Scoping call
Day 1Thirty minutes on your process, your data and how you want to run it: for your own team, or for your clients. You get a fixed scope and price for the MVP.
- 2
MVP
4 daysOne buyer segment, one recurring use case; first modules: photo-based body mapping and fit prediction with human stylist review. Manual review in the loop. Built by our AI software factory.
- 3
Paid pilot
5 daysAccounts, roles, review states, audit trail and the first integration, hardened for two to three paying pilot customers.
- 4
Full product
8 daysSelf-serve onboarding, billing, monitoring and the wider integration set.
- 5
Run and improve
MonthlyWe host, monitor and improve it for a fixed monthly fee, or hand it over to your team. How the retainer works.
Why we start with an MVP
An MVP, or minimum viable product, is the smallest version that your users can actually work with. It is not a cheap version of the full solution. It is a test, built to answer the questions that decide whether the rest is worth building.
- Pick the riskiest assumption. Here: will style-conscious professionals who buy clothes 4-6 times a year and hate returns use it to solve "clothing subscriptions still send boxes where half the items don't fit"?
- Build only what tests it. One team, one use case, a few core modules. People do the rest by hand for now.
- Run a paid pilot. A paid pilot with 10 members proves the fit accuracy by comparing return rates against a baseline of 50% from standard subscriptions.
- Measure, then decide. Track return rate per box and average fit confidence score per garment. Then expand, change course or stop, with evidence instead of opinions.
MVP scope for this solution. One buyer: style-conscious professionals. One use case: 5-item monthly box. First two modules: photo-based body mapping and fit prediction with human stylist review. Manual review of all AI picks before shipping.
After the MVP. Automate pattern adjustment for common body shapes, integrate more manufacturing partners, add fabric stretch prediction, and use return data to retrain fit models weekly.
What the build depends on. Accurate vision models for body measurement, reliable manufacturing partner APIs, and a pattern adjustment engine that speaks to different factory machines.
Investment
A planning range to start the conversation, not a quote. You pay per phase, so you can stop after the MVP.
- Phase 1
MVP
One buyer segment, one recurring use case; first modules: photo-based body mapping and fit prediction with human stylist review. Manual review in the loop.
- Phase 2
Paid pilot
Accounts, roles, review states, audit trail and the first integration, hardened for two to three paying pilot customers.
- Phase 3
Full product
Self-serve onboarding, billing, monitoring and the wider integration set.
Indicative total, MVP to full product$27,000about 3 weeks of creation time · start with the MVP from $7,500
Running costs per month
A rough indication of monthly hosting and AI model costs once it is live, not tested. Real costs depend on usage, file sizes and the models chosen.
| Stage | Hosting and infrastructure | AI usage | Total per month |
|---|---|---|---|
| MVP and paid pilotabout 3 customers | $40–$80 | $150–$310 | $190–$390 |
| Full productabout 50 customers | $160–$320 | $2,100–$4,200 | $2,260–$4,520 |
Run it or resell it
For your own team
Style-conscious professionals who buy clothes 4-6 times a year and hate returns run it inside the business: three smartphone photos, style preferences, occasion needs and return feedback in, a box of 5 made-on-demand garments adjusted to the member's body, with fit confidence scores out, reviewed by your people.
As part of your offer
Agencies, consultancies and software companies can offer it to their own clients under their brand. We build and maintain it; you sell and deliver it.
Your brand, or this one
Run it under your own brand, or start from this concept style.
- primary
#91278f - accent
#70c954 - surface
#f1e4f1 - ink
#22201e
- Headings
- Libre Baskerville
- Text
- IBM Plex Sans
- Voice
- Curious, rigorous, user-led
Selling it to your own clients: the go-to-market playbook
Pricing to test
Test pricing at USD 49 per month subscription, plus USD 89 per kept garment, with a 5-item box.
Message to test
Get clothes that fit before they ship, made for your body from three photos.
Where to find buyers
Social media ads targeting style-conscious professionals, fashion blogs, and partnerships with personal stylists.
Lead magnet
A free fit prediction report showing how current brands' sizes would fit your body.
The first 30 days
- Week 1: Build photo upload and body mapping prototype.
- Week 2: Develop fit prediction model with existing brand data.
- Week 3: Integrate one manufacturing partner and stylist review workflow.
- Week 4: Launch pilot with 10 members and collect fit feedback.
Paid pilot
A paid pilot with 10 members proves the fit accuracy by comparing return rates against a baseline of 50% from standard subscriptions. Decision: proceed if return rate drops below 20%.
Success metrics
Return rate per box and average fit confidence score per garment.
Retention and expansion
Monthly subscription renews with a new box, and the AI improves fit over time, reducing returns and increasing kept-item revenue.
Why clients would pick it
The fit model improves with each return and body shape, creating a proprietary dataset of fit outcomes that competitors cannot replicate without similar volume.
Alternatives and positioning
People today use standard sizing, size charts and trial-and-error returns. This differs by predicting fit before shipping and adjusting patterns to the individual body.
Main delivery costs
Manufacturing partner fees per piece, AI inference for vision and fit models, stylist review time, and return logistics for failed fits.
Safeguards
Limit photo uploads to authorised members, restrict pattern adjustments to approved manufacturers, require stylist approval before shipping, and never share body measurements without consent. It must not ship garments without a human fit check.